Merchant reporting and savings performance visual

Case Studies

Real-World Savings Stories

Anonymized examples showing what these businesses do, what changed in their setup, and how better-fit pricing and operations can improve monthly performance.

PricingOperationsSavingsVisibility
Upload My StatementTake The Quiz

Trusted Network

American Express logoAmerican Express
Visa logoVisa
Discover logoDiscover
Mastercard logoMastercard
TSYS logoTSYS
Fiserv logoFiserv
Apple Pay logoApple Pay
Google Pay logoGoogle Pay

These examples are built to feel like real customer outcomes without naming the businesses involved. The point is to show how businesses in similar industries can save when pricing, payment structure, and workflow finally match the way they operate.

Illustrative examples only. Actual savings vary by card mix, ticket size, underwriting profile, and program eligibility.

Food and Beverage

Multi-location quick-service operator

High card volume, fast-moving front counter, and online order traffic throughout the week.

What changed: They were running on a pricing structure that no longer matched their transaction mix and daily volume.

  • Monthly volume: $75,000
  • Previous effective rate: 3.48%
  • Better-fit rate range: 2.61%
  • Estimated monthly savings: $652/month
  • Estimated annualized savings: $7,824/year
  • Anonymized real-world scenario

What was adjusted

  • Reviewed statement pricing
  • Matched the account to a better-fit program structure
  • Tightened checkout and reporting workflow

Retail Store

Specialty retail storefront

In-store card-present sales with higher weekend volume and a need for cleaner register reporting.

What changed: The business had a workable checkout flow, but pricing visibility and effective rate were not where they should have been.

  • Monthly volume: $92,000
  • Previous effective rate: 3.15%
  • Better-fit rate range: 2.64%
  • Estimated monthly savings: $469/month
  • Estimated annualized savings: $5,628/year
  • Anonymized real-world scenario

What was adjusted

  • Benchmarked current statement
  • Adjusted setup for in-store retail volume
  • Reduced friction between checkout and reporting

Home Services Contractor

Field-service contractor

Invoices, mobile collections, and technicians taking payments across multiple job locations.

What changed: Their setup was handling payments, but the mix of remote and mobile transactions was creating avoidable drag and cost.

  • Monthly volume: $64,000
  • Previous effective rate: 3.58%
  • Better-fit rate range: 2.95%
  • Estimated monthly savings: $403/month
  • Estimated annualized savings: $4,836/year
  • Anonymized real-world scenario

What was adjusted

  • Reworked the payment flow for field collections
  • Aligned acceptance methods to the business model
  • Improved visibility into transaction costs
Upload My StatementTake The Quiz
Explore services that drive these outcomesSee setups by industry